INDUSTRY NEWS
Wising up to an age-old problem
Source: CPA Online 'Superannuation - Articles'
1st October 2000


This material is reproduced by permission but does not purport to be the official or authorised version.
The accuracy of the content is not guaranteed. Please rely only on the authorised document.


Australian CPA October 2000

Wising up to an age-old problem

Planning for retirement has never been more urgent than now, says Brad Pragnell, but first the superannuation system needs an overhaul.

After years of pressure from industry groups and CPA Australia, an overhaul of our retirement income system is imminent. But even if the review is delayed by the next Federal election, the wheels of debate are spinning.

The review will be a golden opportunity for Australia to put the finishing touches on what should be a world-class retirement income system.

We need a system that better integrates all three pillars of the retirement income system - age pension, compulsory and voluntary super. We also need one that provides adequate savings, is simple to administer and is sustainable.

The number of retired people is climbing. More than 10 per cent of Australia's population is aged over 65. The Australian Bureau of Statistics predicts the figure will double during the next 30 years.

This fact alone presents major economic issues for Australia expanding well beyond pure retirement income needs. The retirement crunch of the 21st century must be dealt with now, otherwise governments will be confronted with either raising taxes or cutting back existing levels of support provided through the old age pension.

Tax treatment

The tax treatment of superannuation is a significant problem. Many other countries tax superannuation either when it enters or exits the system. Australia is unique in that it taxes superannuation at three points: when a contribution is made, on investment earnings and when taken as a benefit.

The superannuation surcharge, in particular, is a shambles, costing $200 million to administer the raising of less than $400 million.

All governments have classified superannuation as a revenue 'soft target' where billions can be collected with minimal political pain.

At the moment, the Government earns more than $5 billion in tax revenue from superannuation every year. Every dollar that is taken out of superannuation now is money that won't be available for the future retirement needs of Australians. To deal with these impending issues we need forward policy planning now.

For CPA Australia, the review of retirement income policy will form a key part of our work for the next couple of years.

The first of several discussion papers by the Superannuation Centre of Excellence forms the platform for extensive review and involvement of members in the ensuing debate. The paper suggests the key principles for reform are a sufficient, sustainable and simple retirement income system. Firstly, and most importantly, we need a system that provides adequate savings to alleviate poverty and provide income replacement for aged people. Even with the Superannuation Guarantee rising to nine per cent in the next couple of years, there may not be enough savings for retirement. This will require a broader and deeper approach and commitment to encourage Australians to save for their retirement.

While boosting the Superannuation Guarantee is an option; it must be remembered it would likely be employers who would be obliged to shoulder this cost.

We also need a system that can be sustained over the long-term. The system must be affordable and one that pays for itself. This means inflows and outflows must reconcile. It must also be politically sustainable and supported by all parties. As the Australian Financial Review reported recently, one of the main problems with superannuation is that it is a long-term plan while politicians are short-term creatures.

To work, the entire system must be simple and transparent. This will help the decision-making process and also ensure administrative costs are contained.

Past imperfections

Simplicity should also extend to implementation so past difficulties, such as those experienced with the surcharge, are not repeated.

Finally, without question, the system must be supported by policies that make it easy to save and instil national value and purpose in retirement savings.

As superannuation writer Barrie Dunstan reported in the AFR: 'We need to develop sound investment practices and we need to protect income for retirement.'

The COE's discussion paper on the principals for a retirement income policy is the first of a series of papers on retirement income. A series of fact sheets dealing with areas such as taxation and savings is being prepared as part of CPA Australia's campaign to help drive the debate and shape the direction of retirement income policy in Australia.


About the author

Brad Pragnell is CPA Australia's superannuation and financial planning consultant





Further details:
Australian Society of Certified Practising Accountants - CPA Online
Web site: www.cpaonline.com.au
Submit an Article
to the Newsroom
DISCLAIMER: Supercorp Australia Pty Ltd and its officers and employees, disclaim all and any liability and responsibility to any person for any act or consequence or omission in respect of the above information. No person should rely on the contents of this information without obtaining advice from a qualified professional.
Copyright © 1999-2002 - Supercorp Australia Pty Ltd - ABN 92 063 307 700
Previous Article Contents Next Article